|
Post by kingofkings on Jul 31, 2008 19:02:31 GMT -5
This rating system was intended to create different classes of wrestler based on RP talent, and activity. Other e-feds do this with their weekly events, being as the RP quality of the week determines who wins and loses. So if an RP fed were to use this style of rating system, and increase/decrease based on victories would be perfectly acceptable. However, in CRF, since people who next-to-never RP have won titles in the past, that can't be done.
|
|
Ace.
Avatar Guy
Member Of CRF Mayhem Heavyweight Division
"You're all gonna die!"
Posts: 325
|
Post by Ace. on Aug 13, 2008 0:08:21 GMT -5
How this seeing that the CRF is start up again. But this time with a Ratings System and. Seeing on every WWE game a Created superstar overall starts at 0. That what we should do. But add in Before Closing Title Belt History on who had won. A Title Belt and CRF Legend/Hall of Famers. Add the Current Title Belt History so everyone has some thing to start out with. Here a point System that could work for this
crf heavy weight title =15 points crf world titles =15 points crf intercontinental title =10 points crf hardcore title =7 points crf tag team and all other title can be 5 points crf Legend =10 points crf Hall of Famers=10 points
Used this to find out what my and green would start with. Using this jace would have 40 overall. To start his way up green would have 37 for overall.
and for Promos/Match u can use this for point System
Promos can go to 1 to 6 if your Promo goes all week u get 6 points. If your Promo goes for 1 day u get 1 point 2 days 2 points 3 days 3 points 4 days 4 points 5 days 5 points
win match =3 points loss a match - 3 points win main events/title match =5 loss main events/title match -5
p.s and for the good match. I think they should be for PPVs till. You get your overall to 70 or higher. Then u can start to have good matchs for a week match and at PPVs.
what u think about this good, bad, no, could work,?
|
|
Jake Jones
Jake Jones Can Dance Better then Christopher Daniels!
Posts: 2,979
|
Post by Jake Jones on Aug 13, 2008 8:25:09 GMT -5
Ace u have to make everything difficult
|
|
Draven
CRF Roster Manager
Draven's Death Driver
Posts: 735
|
Post by Draven on Aug 15, 2008 1:26:08 GMT -5
The ratings system is in the process of being revised a little. I think the points will go away but the basic system will remain. I am trying to update based on all the promos but that is taking more time than I thought.
Very soon I will also be able to watch all the matches again so maybe I could update the ratings more often.
|
|
|
Post by hughesy on Sept 12, 2008 20:13:29 GMT -5
So are these ranking ever going to get updated or has this hole idea kinda just gone out the window?
|
|
|
Post by Baby Dogg on Sept 16, 2009 3:47:21 GMT -5
Sorry to bump a topic over a year old but I'm wondering, did this ever go anywhere?
|
|
|
Post by Le Biker on Sept 16, 2009 15:12:17 GMT -5
If I recall, it was brought up, to a point, but it never really made much of a difference on anything, either because of general disapproval from the members, or the lack of enforcement. I'm not sure which. Either way, yes. There was an attempt at this.
|
|
Jake Jones
Jake Jones Can Dance Better then Christopher Daniels!
Posts: 2,979
|
Post by Jake Jones on Sept 16, 2009 16:53:52 GMT -5
It was because of damo that it got canceled.
He was a rookie, so he shoulda had low points but he won the championship and his points went through the roof and it became unfair to members who had been here for years.
Plus with 70 percent on 80-100 already it was hard to seperate everyone
|
|
|
Post by Baby Dogg on Sept 17, 2009 21:54:08 GMT -5
Aha! Cool cool, thanks for satisfying my curiosity guys ^^
|
|
|
Post by Fighter-X on Sept 18, 2009 8:10:09 GMT -5
Actually we had worked out a way to address most of the things that have been mentioned. The real problem is that it became too time consuming for anyone to manage it the way it should be. This is actually the third time we tried to implement a ratings system but it always fails for the same reason.
We even came up with another idea to try and simplify things (the ASR fed) but that would only work if we continued to get new people on a more frequent basis. If anyone has any suggestions that might work then by all means let us know.
|
|
Jake Jones
Jake Jones Can Dance Better then Christopher Daniels!
Posts: 2,979
|
Post by Jake Jones on Sept 18, 2009 8:21:01 GMT -5
Power 25 based on wins and losses?
I Dunno.
|
|
|
Post by Baby Dogg on Sept 18, 2009 16:04:32 GMT -5
Power lists are a great idea in theory, but we run a weekly power 5 in my fed, and it still doesn't always get updated even though it's only a handful of people. Fedheading takes a LOT of time and things like Power lists, sadly, are one of those things which often seem to end up getting pushed down the list of priorities Ratings and records are a bit different - if a power list doesn't get updated, it's not that big a deal other than in terms of professionalism and pride. But records and ratings are an essential part of the process so there's never the temptation to skip them when it's been a long week. But yeah, I know how hard it is to keep on top of ratings and stuff, and even though I'm used to writing matches, I'm sure recording and uploading the videos must take up a comparable amount of time.
|
|